What we know about the confidentiality of the clubhouse (and why we must not trust too much)
The private life of Clubhouse, the new social reality which allows you to create a piece in which we discuss a subject with voice messages, must be at the center of our attention. Because it is easy to throw This new adventure Without considering the imposed limits and the possibilities offered by this reality.
What we know is that reflection on Social societies It is more and more important. Different realities, such as Facebook, for example, failed. And they ignored the hopes of users who trusted.
Because they shared confidential data and information, and others decided to Run for a blanket. Both with regard to data collection procedures and sharing. But also on the clubhouse, there are reflections to do.
How the clubhouse intimacy works
We must record an interesting starting point: Clubhouse looks like a social platform with a fairly solid and respectful privacy. At least on paper. We are talking about an application designed only for audio content that allows users to create parts and enter it with the microphone, Just to listen. You can choose whether or not to ask for the word with hand lifting.
Important appearance: for the moment only who He is over 18 years old Anonymous profiles can be admitted to this world: you must check your identity, and it is a good starting point. In addition, there is the most important aspect: that of audio recordings. What happened to the content left in the different parts?
According to the official page dedicated to clubhouse confidentiality, to support accident surveys in the rooms, it is temporarily registered While the room is live. If a user reports a violation while the room is active, Clubhouse uses the audio to analyze the incident, then erases it.
If no accident is reported in a room, each file is deleted at the end of the live broadcast. So, in a good synthesis, all that is said in a room fall into oblivion Once finished.
But is the intimacy on the clubhouse sure?
According to the latest research from Stanford.edu, there may be doubts. In fact, doubts have been raised on data processing, in particular compared to the information managed by Agora.
That is to say the software supplier – based in Shanghai – which deals withClub infrastructure and has access to the metadata of the application. Everything is archived in servers located in the United States, but there is a problem:
Agora is based in the United States and China, but is subject to the law on the security of the People’s Republic of China. The company recognized that it would be held a Provide assistance and support In accordance with Chinese law, including the protection of national security and criminal surveys.
In summary: Does the Chinese government establish that an audio message jeopardizes national security? Agora would be legally kept To help the government locate it and not remove it.
What do you want to do the clubhouse to resolve?
In addition to growth, Clubhouse wants to take cover so as not to miss the confidence of users. The developers of the application, as pointed out, plan to add another Crying of encryption to prevent the transmission of information. This after Stanford researchers found vulnerabilities in its infrastructure. Agora does not comment on the relationship with Clubhouse.

But he emphasizes that he uses data only for technical purposes And this good should be problems with China until the data is stored on the American servants (as confirmed by the Privacy Policy of the clubhouse. But is it all enough? Clubhouse highlights an important point: the company does not sell personal data.
But in certain circumstances, he could share them, without notice to the user, with certain subjects. Such as, for example, affiliates, service providers and another generic user. Everything is obviously explained in the Specific section of the application (For checks and more information, see note.so/privacy-policy).
Read: how to create a play at Clubhouse
Your war of applications and confidentiality
Sometimes the feeling is to be in front of a cold cold war between the world powers, between two blocks that defy on each forehead. At one point, there was the sportsman, then cultural. Today, the battlefield is that of applications and privacy. Are there powers that work in this scenario?
Difficult to give a clear answer. The only thing we can do in our small way is to use social media with consciousness. By sharing the law, leaving our data knowing that it will be used in one way or another. But avoid ignoring the risks that can also occur in relation to the private life of the clubhouse. Do you agree?
Ultimas Entradas Publicadas

Clubhouse confidentiality, are we sure? Does the application protect us?

What is it for, what is it for and how it is used

Clear policies after the Trump affair

Facebook suggestions to maximize the generation of leads via publication and advertisements

How to recognize a false Facebook profile

Here are the best tools to manage Facebook!

How to publish a personalized gif on Instagram

Facebook announcements learning phase. What is and how to get out.

How to improve the LinkedIn profile with a few actions
